U₃O₈––.––FUTURESmodeled

BWXT vs GEV: BWX Technologies vs GE Vernova Compared

BWX Technologies (BWXT) vs GE Vernova (GEV) compared side by side: nuclear exposure, fuel and reactor roles, facilities, DOE awards and live market cap, plus which suits which investor.

Informational only — not investment advice.

BWXTGEV
StageFuel cycleReactor vendors and SMR developers
SegmentFuel fabricationReactor vendor
Nuclear exposurePure playDiversified
ExchangeNYSE:BWXTNYSE:GEV
Market cap (live)$13.36B$275.33B
Short interest4.4% of float3.3% of float
1-year return-28.9%64.5%
Lead cited figure2 facilities (Fuel-cycle facilities)900 MW (Tracked reactor pipeline)

Which suits which investor?

BWXT is a nuclear pure play: naval reactors and fuel for the U.S. Navy, HEU downblending and TRISO fuel, components for SMRs including the first BWRX-300 pressure vessel. GE Vernova is a diversified power-equipment group where nuclear (the BWRX-300 and Global Nuclear Fuel) sits inside a segment dominated by gas turbines and grid gear, so GEV is excluded from the tracker's nuclear totals. Investors wanting concentrated nuclear manufacturing exposure look at BWXT; those wanting SMR optionality inside a large industrial look at GEV, knowing most of its value comes from elsewhere.

Cite this page

Using our data in an article or report? Please credit Yellowcake Analytics with a link.

Citation

Yellowcake Analytics. "BWXT vs GEV: BWX Technologies vs GE Vernova Compared." Yellowcake Analytics, 2026, https://www.yellowcakeanalytics.com/compare/bwxt-vs-gev.

HTML (with link)

<a href="https://www.yellowcakeanalytics.com/compare/bwxt-vs-gev">BWXT vs GEV: BWX Technologies vs GE Vernova Compared</a> — Yellowcake Analytics (www.yellowcakeanalytics.com)